š¤ Is AI Going to Take Your Job?
Why this might be the wrong question . . . and the ones I'm asking instead
HiĀ Friends,
As Pivot celebrates its ten-year (!!) bookiversary this September, Iām grateful to be experiencing a renewed interest in keynote speaking from companies whose team members are anxious about AI as it relates to their career developmentāwith some understandably worrying that their job is at risk. Iām sure all of us have reflected upon this at some point these last few years, watching with a mixture of awe and horror at how quickly AI can perform certain tasks.
I have also been obsessing over these questions for them. Is their job at risk? What could I tell a room full of people whose primary job functions are, in fact, increasingly automated by or performed better and faster with AI?
But this week I realized Iāve been falling into the trap of asking the wrong question. Itās not all that helpful to ask, āWill AI take my job?ā ā one sure to induce future-tripping. AI is already completing many tasks, and assisting on many projects and jobs; but for most of us, itās nowhere close to taking over an entire role.
š So the questions Iām asking now are:
What tasks, within my primary role/s, is AI already better at, or well on the way? What tasks can I get even more help with? (A task is a discreet, concrete action with a clear deliverableālike drafting a slide.)
What jobs within my role are most at risk? What jobs or projects are no longer needed? (Job as a combination of tasks that contribute to a one-off or recurring projectālike publishing a podcast episode.)
What larger responsibilities within my role do I deliver that AI can never replace? (Where a role is a sustained area of ownership, discernment, and results.)
As my friend Peyton Lindley put it the other day, given the complexity of the world now, itās requiring us to engage with deeper, richer, more interesting questions.
Instead of asking, āWill AI take my job?ā consider, āAm I operating at the task, job, or role level? What tasks can I delegate to move into my highest and best expression in terms of role and results?ā
While AI can help me structure and improve a keynote, it cannot deliver the speech (no matter how eerie the āsmugā humanoid robot demos were at CES), nor can it build rapport with potential clients, or connect with audience members.

It might be at risk if I saw my role as solely editing keynote speeches (in actuality, a taskāalthough not for specialists who have higher levels of expertise, experience, and audience attunement). But when I zoom out and recognize my true role as helping high-net-growth individuals navigate whatās next, I can see which elements to double down on (per the Pivot Method) and which ones to delegate.
To be fair, though, I have hired fewer entry-level copywriters and graphic designers these last few years. Instead of turning to sites like 99 Designs, I can do most of what I need myself in Canva with its AI-assist features. I encourage my team member, Faye, to ask our Pivot AI emissary (trained on over seven million words across two decades of my work) for answers when sheās stuckābut Iāve also asked her not to mindlessly copy-paste its milquetoast rote replies directly into customer-facing emails.
As you can imagine, I asked ChatGPT about all this. At first, it spoke to the ways various roles would be boosted by AI. Of course it did! š Donāt ask the barber if you need a haircut. So I dug in a little further:
Me: Earlier, you gave an example that āOne marketer + AI now does what took:
⢠a copywriter
⢠a researcher, and
⢠a junior analyst.ā
So doesnāt that mean that copywriters, researchers, and junior analysts should be worried about their jobs and careers? What should they pursue instead?
ChatGPT: āYes ā people whose work is only copywriting, research, or junior analysis should be concerned. But not because those disciplines are dead. Those titles were never meant to be end states. Whatās disappearing is not the craft ā itās the stand-alone, task-defined version of the job.ā
Do you agree? It does seem concerning that AI is eating a large chunk of roles formerly seen as requiring craft, like video editing and animation. Have you noticed how many TV ads now feature animated characters, or how many articles for major media properties are narrated by an automated voice? Why hire actors when you can snap your fingers and receive a mediocre-yet-passable result?
š„ On a related note, Iām delighted to be on the advisory board for my friend Bob Gowerās newly launched Splendid Torch consultancy for companiesācheck out the teamās insights in the 2026 AI Reality Check round-up (with a hat tip to Julie Clow who helped put it together!).
As Bob has framed this pivoting-around-AI moment during our walk-and-talks:
š¬ I would love to hear from you in the comments . . .
What industry do you work in, and do you or your colleagues experience any job security anxiety as it relates to AIās growing capabilities? How are you approaching it within your role or field? What would you advise a recent college grad to pursue?
š§ Check out this related episode from the archives:
312: Are You Future-Tripping?
As the saying goes, āWorrying is praying for what you donāt want.ā A close cousin is future-tripping: projecting and living in the future instead of being present with what is actually happening, keeping an open mind about whatever might happen next.
š£ This edition of PivotList is brought to you by:
Jenn Smith ā, a Business Bestie Brunch alum, who created a series of quarterly journal-planners ā from a tiny spark of idea-pollen to the full-blown gorgeous expression! Each one walks you through three months with seasonal, monthly, weekly, and daily rituals. Get your set (or start with a single one) here Ā»
š„ Work 1:1 with a Pivot Coach to Clarify Your Strengths
How it works: Check out their longer bios here, then fill out this interest form letting us know if you have a coach member preference. Weāll reply with the booking link for a complimentary 30-minute get-to-know-you call :) If you need help narrowing down the best fit, weāre happy to weigh in! Send us a note at hello@pivotmethod.com.
Weāre wishing you clarity, curiosity, and serendipity with your pivots-in-progress!
ā¤ļøĀ Warmly,Ā







Those humanoid robots are really something... creepy. If I ever have a robot I definitely do not want it to look human.
I do think that humans who cultivate and value what makes humans so cool and irreplaceable will definitely navigate our AI future best. Loved your point about what AI can never do for you... like, it can never be brave FOR you even if it can tell you all day long what you should do or how to be brave. It can never write a funny story about a time you almost ended up on Dateline that actually happened since it's had no embodied human experiences
Thanks for the shout-out, Jenny, and for asking the better questions! I really appreciated the nuanced distinction between tasks, jobs, and roles. If we can operate with that understanding as AI evolves, we will be better prepared to ride the wave with it.